Issue Number:FDR-214
Phase: Design
Decommissioning Process Fuel Debris Retrieval
Investigation Subject Strategy and risk
Issue Establishing fuel debris retrieval strategy

Needs

① Identifying issues for fuel debris retrieval

Desired state and reasons for it

In order to ensure the fuel debris retrieval, fuel debris needs to be safely retrieved with careful preparation and brought into a state of controlled and stable storage.
It is also desirable to organize the items to be considered in anticipated throughputs and clarify issues to be addressed.

Current state against ideal

Fuel debris retrieval methods have not yet been finalized and are still under evaluation and study.
A target of 10 years has been set for the fuel debris retrieval process. Meanwhile, the throughput evaluation under Government-led R&D Program on Decommissioning and Contaminated Water Management estimates that it will take about 4 years to construct access routes and 27.3 to 37.2 years for fuel debris retrieval.
In order to determine the throughput, it is necessary to take into account not only the work processes, such as access to the PCV, positioning and cutting of fuel debris, packaging into the recovery container, and transfer, but also potential process delay risks, such as maintainability, buffer in case of trouble, and capacity of storage facilities.

Issues to be resolved

It is difficult to uniquely identify issues in fuel debris retrieval because it is necessary to proceed while constantly facing the unknown and flexibly reviewing the work, based on new knowledge obtained from various analyses and work experience, etc.
It is also necessary to clarify the criteria for comprehensively judging evaluation axes of different natures, such as safety level, field applicability, technical feasibility, business continuity, and throughput.
② Establishing a comprehensive strategy for fuel debris retrieval

Desired state and reasons for it

In order to optimize fuel debris retrieval, it is desirable to develop a comprehensive strategy for collecting fuel debris, including prioritization of the location and shape of the fuel debris to be retrieved, collection methods, and advance the state estimation based on the analysis results of collected fuel debris.

Current state against ideal

[Unit 1]

The PCV internal investigation is being conducted to check the condition of the existing structures outside the pedestal and the spread of sediments, etc and an investigation inside the pedestal through the worker access port is also planned in the future.
Compared to Units 2 and 3, the RPV and PCV are smaller in size due to the smaller plant output, and the layout of plant equipment is different. In addition, the distribution of sediments in the RPV and inside and outside the pedestal is expected to be different from those in Units 2 and 3, although this is expected to be clarified in future investigations.

[Unit 2]

Preparations are currently underway for a test retrieval, after which the scale of retrieval will be expanded in stages.
According to the PCV internal investigation(inside the pedestal) and the investigation and analysis using muons, etc. conducted so far, it is considered that a large amount of fuel debris exists at the bottom of the RPV. In addition, it is pointed out that there is a possibility to exist a part of the fuel in the core. The fuel debris that fell to the bottom of the PCV is unlikely to have spread outside the pedestal.

[Unit 3]

The investigation of the method for further expansion of the scale of retrieval is underway ahead of other Units, and from FY2022, on-site applicability and technological feasibility are being investigated for issues and risks of the method to be investigated more in depth.
The PCV internal investigation (inside the pedestal) has been conducted so far, and it has been confirmed that the CRD housing support has partially fallen off and is deformed, and that several structures, including presumed in-core structures, have fallen down in the lower part of the pedestal. In addition, sediments that are presumed to be fuel debris have been confirmed.
Furthermore, from muon surveys and analyses, it is estimated that more fuel debris than in Unit 2 fell into the pedestal and may have spread out of the pedestal through the worker access port.

[All Units]

Although damage to a part of the pedestal has been confirmed in the ongoing Unit 1 PCV internal investigation, it has been also confirmed in the past R&D that the seismic evaluation assuming the extent of damage does not significantly impair the support function.

Issues to be resolved

[Unit 1]

As for the utilization of the knowledge to be obtained through the test retrieval at Unit 2, it is necessary to reflect, for example, the status of existing structures and distribution of sediments, distribution of gamma radiation and neutron counts, the degree of impact on confinement caused by loading and unloading of equipment, and information on fuel debris to be collected during the retrieval in equipment design, retrieval procedures, safety assessment, etc.
In addition, it is necessary to investigate the retrieval method considering the results of the investigation of the method in the preceding Unit 3.
Although it has been evaluated that there is almost no fuel debris in the core from the survey and analysis using muons, it is not a direct , so a direct video survey is required in the future investigation.

[Unit 2]

Since not all of the fuel debris is planned to be retrieved by the side access method, it is necessary to investigate the method for further expansion of the scale of retrieval.
Considering the knowledge to be obtained through the test retrieval, it is necessary to proceed with the design, fabrication, and installation of fuel debris retrieval facilities, safety systems (confinement, fuel debris cooling, criticality control, etc.), maintenance facilities for fuel debris retrieval and storing facilities.
It is necessary to investigate the method, taking into account the possibility that some fuel may remain in the core.
Since the investigation outside the pedestal has not been conducted, a direct video survey is necessary in future investigation.

[Unit 3]

In order to increase the certainty of the selected method, it is necessary to investigate plans for surveys to understand the distribution of sediments outside the pedestal, as well as additional surveys in the pedestal and in the RPV, and to reflect the results of these surveys in the investigation and design of the method.
In investigating the method, it is necessary to investigate confinement facilities considering the damage status of the reactor building.

[All Units]

It is necessary to enhance the knowledge through internal investigations, etc., and to consider the events during the accident inferred from the discharge of high-temperature sediments (fuel debris) out of the pedestal. Taking these knowledges and considerations into account, it is necessary to investigate the method of retrieving sediments inside and outside the pedestal, the possibility of sediments flowing into the S/C, etc., and to reflect the knowledge obtained from the internal investigation in the fuel debris retrieval method, including those of other Units.
Since the information obtained so far about the inside the PCV of each Unit is limited and there are many areas where direct visual information has not been obtained, investigations on further surveys such as internal investigation of the PCV and RPV of each Unit should be proceeded to collect more information at an early stage, including the damage situation at the bottom of the RPV and the existence and distribution of sediments outside the pedestal.
Maintenance of remote equipment and restoration in case of failure also need to be considered. It is necessary to investigate a method considering the entire work sequence from preparation to retrieval and the throughput, and it is necessary to select a method that can be used for retrieval even if the entire site situation cannot be identified, and a method that is not affected by external events such as earthquakes (robust method).
After retrieving the fuel debris, it is necessary to investigate the criteria for shifting to building dismantling. In other words, it is important to determine to what extent fuel debris retrieval can be said to be complete and how to confirm this.

Relevant Issues

References

Please note that this English text is a provisional translation of the Japanese original.